The EU prices carbon at €77.4; China at ¥86.13 ≈ €11. Same planet, 7× gap. Here's why it exists — and why it's closing at the EU border.
| EU ETS | China ETS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €77.4 (11 Jun 2026) | ¥86.13 ≈ €11 (Mar 2025) |
| Type | absolute cap-and-trade | intensity-based (output benchmarks) |
| Coverage | power + industry + aviation/maritime, ~40% of EU emissions | power + (2024–25) cement, steel, aluminium — world's largest by tonnes |
| Allocation | auction + shrinking free allocation (0% by 2034) | mostly free, benchmark-based |
| Border measure | CBAM on imports | — |
China's ETS is intensity-based: plants get allowances per unit of output, so the system pushes efficiency rather than absolute cuts, and surplus allocation has kept prices low (the 2026 reset tightens carry-over rules to fix this). The EU has a fixed shrinking cap and full auctioning ahead — scarcity is designed in.
Boilers, kilns, heat exchangers, valves and steam lines lose energy continuously. Inzonex makes patented (UK GB2508992.1) removable modular insulation — snap-fastened covers engineered per temperature tier, not generic off-the-shelf jackets:
Under CBAM, a Chinese steel exporter's EU-bound tonnes pay the EU price minus what was paid at home: ≈€77.4−€11 ≈ €66 per tonne of CO2 of gap, on the phase-in share. By 2030 that's ≈€32/t CO2 on every exported tonne — the cost advantage of cheap domestic carbon evaporates exactly where it competes with EU producers.