Two routes to the same tonne of CO2 — at very different cost, speed and risk. The honest sequencing answer is usually «cheaper one first, it funds the other».
| Removable insulation (modular) | Carbon capture & storage (CCS) | |
|---|---|---|
| Abatement cost | saves money | €60–140/t |
| Addresses | 2–5% | 50–95% of a stream |
| Payback | 0.5–2 yr | >10 yr, policy-dependent |
| Best for |
Verdict: start with Removable insulation (modular) — lower €/t and faster payback; bank its savings toward the structural step. Sequencing beats either/or: every tonne the cheap measure removes shrinks the expensive one's required size.
Full page: Removable insulation (modular) → · Full page: Carbon capture & storage (CCS) →
Boilers, kilns, heat exchangers, valves and steam lines lose energy continuously. Inzonex makes Inzonex Modular Insulation — snap-fastened modules engineered per temperature tier, not generic off-the-shelf jackets:
Every tonne you stop emitting is a tonne you don't have to report: cutting heat loss is a measurable, auditable Scope 1 reduction that flows straight into EU ETS, CBAM and your ESG / CSRD disclosures — not an offset, an actual emission cut.