Two routes to the same tonne of CO2 — at very different cost, speed and risk. The honest sequencing answer is usually «cheaper one first, it funds the other».
| Boiler economizers | Waste heat to power (ORC) | |
|---|---|---|
| Abatement cost | €5–25/t | €40–90/t |
| Addresses | +3–6% boiler efficiency | 5–20% of waste stream → kWh |
| Payback | 1–3 yr | 4–8 yr |
| Best for |
Verdict: start with Boiler economizers — lower €/t and faster payback; bank its savings toward the structural step. Sequencing beats either/or: every tonne the cheap measure removes shrinks the expensive one's required size.
Full page: Boiler economizers → · Full page: Waste heat to power (ORC) →
Boilers, kilns, heat exchangers, valves and steam lines lose energy continuously. Inzonex makes Inzonex Modular Insulation — snap-fastened modules engineered per temperature tier, not generic off-the-shelf jackets:
Every tonne you stop emitting is a tonne you don't have to report: cutting heat loss is a measurable, auditable Scope 1 reduction that flows straight into EU ETS, CBAM and your ESG / CSRD disclosures — not an offset, an actual emission cut.