Two routes to the same tonne of CO2 — at very different cost, speed and risk. The honest sequencing answer is usually «cheaper one first, it funds the other».
| Carbon capture & storage (CCS) | Hydrogen fuel switch | |
|---|---|---|
| Abatement cost | €60–140/t | €80–150/t |
| Addresses | 50–95% of a stream | up to 100% of fuel CO2 |
| Payback | >10 yr, policy-dependent | >8 yr today |
| Best for |
Verdict: start with Carbon capture & storage (CCS) — lower €/t and faster payback; bank its savings toward the structural step. Sequencing beats either/or: every tonne the cheap measure removes shrinks the expensive one's required size.
Full page: Carbon capture & storage (CCS) → · Full page: Hydrogen fuel switch →
Boilers, kilns, heat exchangers, valves and steam lines lose energy continuously. Inzonex makes Inzonex Modular Insulation — snap-fastened modules engineered per temperature tier, not generic off-the-shelf jackets:
Every tonne you stop emitting is a tonne you don't have to report: cutting heat loss is a measurable, auditable Scope 1 reduction that flows straight into EU ETS, CBAM and your ESG / CSRD disclosures — not an offset, an actual emission cut.