Home / North America / United States of America / Front Range Project

Front Range Project

Waste power plant in Colorado, United States of America. Approximate location 40.0294, -105.0047.

WasteColoradoUnited States of America

Front Range Project is a 3 MW waste power plant in Colorado, United States of America. It is operated by Timberline Energy LLC. Based on reported annual generation of 20 GWh, it can supply roughly 5.8k homes. It ranks #7999 of 10,938 United States of America power plants by installed capacity. Commissioned in 2011, it is around 15 years old — relatively modern. In context, the national grid averages 384 gCO₂/kWh (43.0% low-carbon) (2025).

3Source-backed capacity
20GWh reported / yr
5,828homes powered
2011commissioned (~15 yrs)

Plant data: WRI Global Power Plant Database (CC BY 4.0), id USA0059143.

Data status

Known data

FacilityFront Range Project WRI
CountryUnited States of America · Colorado WRI
Coordinates40.0294, -105.0047 WRI
FuelWaste WRI
MW installed capacity3 MW WRI source record; scope not independently normalised
OwnerTimberline Energy LLC WRI
Commissioned2011 WRI
GWh reported / yr20 GWh/yr WRI

Calculated from dataset

Capacity rank in country#7999 of 10938 calculated
Fuel-specific rank in country#421 of 551 calculated
Capacity vs country/fuel peers0.48× · 7 MW median · 551 peers calculated
Homes-powered equivalent5,828 calculated from reported generation
Climate10.2°C · HDD 3,145 derived from coordinates
Environmental severityC1 · 37/100 derived from coordinates

Not available

TechnologyNot available not in dataset
GWh reported / yrNot available not in dataset
CO₂ emissionsNot available not in dataset

Known, modelled and calculated values are kept separate. Missing fields are shown as unavailable.

Data provenance

The capacity and/or fuel fields on this page include a source-backed provenance label from GEM, an official registry, Wikidata, OSM, or a cross-source match.

capacity: Wikidata P2109 nameplate capacity; fuel: WRI source-record fuel

In context: how this plant compares

At 3 MW, Front Range Project is below the median waste plant in United States of America (7 MW). Waste-to-energy plants burn municipal solid waste to generate electricity and heat, cutting landfill volume while recovering energy from residual waste.

Capacity comparison computed from the WRI Global Power Plant Database; fuel-type context is general engineering background.

Reported generation trend

2013: 24 GWh20132014: 24 GWh20142015: 22 GWh20152016: 24 GWh20162017: 22 GWh20172018: 22 GWh20182019: 20 GWh201924 GWh

Annual generation (GWh), WRI Global Power Plant Database (CC BY 4.0).

Owner

Operated by Timberline Energy LLC.

Local climate & thermal context

This waste plant recovers energy by combusting municipal or industrial waste. It sits in a cold semi-arid steppe climate (Köppen BSk) — Northern Hemisphere, latitude 40.0°N — which shapes how much energy it can produce and how its output varies through the year.

10.2°Cannual mean temp
3,145heating degree-days (base 18°C)
328cooling degree-days (base 18°C)
1,575 melevation

Monthly mean temperature

J: -1 °CJF: 1 °CFM: 5 °CMA: 9 °CAM: 14 °CMJ: 20 °CJJ: 23 °CJA: 22 °CAS: 17 °CSO: 11 °CON: 3 °CND: -1 °CD23 °C

Heating degree-days here run 28% above the median power plant in this dataset — a proxy for how much extra energy heated equipment must replace through its surfaces in winter.

Climate heat-demand index: 66/100 — this site sits in the mid third of the power plants we cover by heating degree-days.

Climate normals: WorldClim 2.1 (1970–2000 monthly normals, 10 arc-min, CC BY 4.0); zone: Köppen-Geiger world climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006, 0.5° grid). Degree-days & heat-demand index computed by PowerAtlas — a modelled heat-demand proxy, not a measured site figure.

Site climate & environmental severity

For a plant’s outdoor hardware — heat-recovery steam generators (HRSG), expansion joints, valves, flanges and their insulation — the local climate sets how fast unprotected steel and coatings degrade. This site sits in a benign, low-corrosion environment (estimated ISO 9223 class C1 — Very low), with dust abrasion the leading environmental stress.

C1ISO 9223 corrosivity (indicative)
37/100environmental-severity index
24.3°Cseasonal temperature swing
1243 kmdistance to coast

Higher environmental severity is exactly where protective removable insulation pays back most: a sheltered micro-climate slows corrosion, UV and thermal-cycling damage and extends outdoor hardware service life. This is an indicative site-climate context — not a condition assessment of any specific plant or operator.

Indicative estimate via the ISO 9223:2012 informative method (atmospheric corrosivity from temperature, time-of-wetness and airborne salinity), using WorldClim climate normals, the Köppen-Geiger class and coast distance. Indicative, not a measured corrosion rate.

How it compares & nearby plants

The #421 largest waste power plant of 551 in United States of America by capacity.

United States of America has 551 waste power plants in this dataset, together about 10,154 MW of capacity.

Nearby power plants

Location

Coordinates 40.0294, -105.0047 from WRI Global Power Plant Database (CC BY 4.0). View on OpenStreetMap.

Frequently asked questions

What type of power plant is Front Range Project?

Front Range Project is a 3 MW source-record waste power plant in Colorado, United States of America, commissioned in 2011.

How much electricity does Front Range Project generate?

Front Range Project generates about 20 GWh of electricity per year.

How many homes can Front Range Project power?

Its output is enough to supply roughly 5,828 homes.

Who operates Front Range Project?

Front Range Project is operated by Timberline Energy LLC.

Built from open public data; no personal information. Operate this site? Request a correction or removal.