Home / Asia / South Korea / BUSAN JUNG-KWAN

BUSAN JUNG-KWAN

Other power plant in Busan, South Korea. Approximate location 35.315, 129.1777.

OtherBusanSouth KoreaCO₂ modelled

BUSAN JUNG-KWAN is a 100 MW other power station in Busan, South Korea. Based on its capacity (estimated), it can supply roughly 75k homes (estimated). It ranks #131 of 216 South Korea power plants by installed capacity. Its modelled annual emissions are 119,418 t CO₂/yr (Climate TRACE), equivalent to about 28k cars driven for a year. In context, the national grid averages 417 gCO₂/kWh (40.0% low-carbon) (2025).

100Legacy source-record capacity
75,310homes powered (est.)
119,418t CO₂ / yr (Climate TRACE)

Plant data: WRI Global Power Plant Database (CC BY 4.0), id CT-5479.

Data status

Known data

FacilityBUSAN JUNG-KWAN Climate TRACE
CountrySouth Korea · Busan Climate TRACE
Coordinates35.315, 129.1777 Climate TRACE
FuelOther Climate TRACE
MW installed capacity100 MW Climate TRACE source record; scope not independently normalised

Modelled source data

CO₂ emissions119,418 t CO₂/yr modelled · Climate TRACE

Calculated from dataset

Capacity rank in country#131 of 216 calculated
Fuel-specific rank in country#1 of 1 calculated
Homes-powered equivalent75,310 calculated
Climate13.7°C · HDD 2,123 derived from coordinates
Environmental severityC4 · 44/100 derived from coordinates

Not available

OwnerNot available not in dataset
CommissionedNot available not in dataset
TechnologyNot available not in dataset
GWh reported / yrNot available not in dataset

Known, modelled and calculated values are kept separate. Missing fields are shown as unavailable.

Data provenance

The capacity and fuel fields on this page are source-record values from the upstream open dataset. They are useful for identification and ranking, but they have not been upgraded to a 2026 registry/GEM-location verified value.

capacity: Climate TRACE source-record capacity (modelled/legacy); fuel: Primary fuel not stated in available source record; classified as Other/industrial-mixed pending country registry match

In context: how this plant compares

This facility converts its energy source into electricity for the grid; its capacity, fuel type and location determine its role in the national power mix.

Capacity comparison computed from the WRI Global Power Plant Database; fuel-type context is general engineering background.

~119,418 t CO₂/yr (modelled) — in everyday terms

This facility's annual emissions are roughly equivalent to:

28kpassenger cars driven for a year
16khomes' yearly energy use
2.0 milliontree seedlings grown 10 years to absorb it

Equivalencies via US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies; modelled emissions from Climate TRACE.

Local climate & thermal context

This other plant generates electricity for the grid. It sits in a humid subtropical climate (Köppen Cfa) — Northern Hemisphere, latitude 35.3°N — which shapes how much energy it can produce and how its output varies through the year.

13.7°Cannual mean temp
2,123heating degree-days (base 18°C)
572cooling degree-days (base 18°C)
108 melevation

Monthly mean temperature

J: 2 °CJF: 4 °CFM: 7 °CMA: 13 °CAM: 17 °CMJ: 20 °CJJ: 24 °CJA: 25 °CAS: 21 °CSO: 16 °CON: 10 °CND: 5 °CD25 °C

Heating degree-days here run 14% below the median power plant in this dataset — a proxy for how much extra energy heated equipment must replace through its surfaces in winter.

Climate heat-demand index: 45/100 — this site sits in the mid third of the power plants we cover by heating degree-days.

Climate normals: WorldClim 2.1 (1970–2000 monthly normals, 10 arc-min, CC BY 4.0); zone: Köppen-Geiger world climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006, 0.5° grid). Degree-days & heat-demand index computed by PowerAtlas — a modelled heat-demand proxy, not a measured site figure.

Site climate & environmental severity

For a plant’s outdoor hardware — heat-recovery steam generators (HRSG), expansion joints, valves, flanges and their insulation — the local climate sets how fast unprotected steel and coatings degrade. This site sits in a corrosive environment (estimated ISO 9223 class C4 — High), with humidity / wetness the leading environmental stress.

C4ISO 9223 corrosivity (indicative)
44/100environmental-severity index
23.0°Cseasonal temperature swing
39 kmdistance to coast

Higher environmental severity is exactly where protective removable insulation pays back most: a sheltered micro-climate slows corrosion, UV and thermal-cycling damage and extends outdoor hardware service life. This is an indicative site-climate context — not a condition assessment of any specific plant or operator.

Indicative estimate via the ISO 9223:2012 informative method (atmospheric corrosivity from temperature, time-of-wetness and airborne salinity), using WorldClim climate normals, the Köppen-Geiger class and coast distance. Indicative, not a measured corrosion rate.

How it compares & nearby plants

South Korea has 1 other power plant in this dataset, together about 100 MW of capacity.

Nearby power plants

Location

Coordinates 35.315, 129.1777 from WRI Global Power Plant Database (CC BY 4.0). View on OpenStreetMap.

Frequently asked questions

What type of power plant is BUSAN JUNG-KWAN?

BUSAN JUNG-KWAN is a 100 MW source-record other power plant in Busan, South Korea.

How many homes can BUSAN JUNG-KWAN power?

Its output is enough to supply roughly 75,310 homes (estimated).

How much CO₂ does BUSAN JUNG-KWAN emit?

BUSAN JUNG-KWAN has modelled emissions of about 119,418 tonnes of CO₂ per year (Climate TRACE).

Built from open public data; no personal information. Operate this site? Request a correction or removal.