Home / United States / Steel plants / Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant

Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant

Steel Plant in United States. Approximate location 31.15169, -87.9883.

Steel PlantUnited StatesCO₂ estimate (modelled)

Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant is a steel plant in United States. Steel plants burn coal in blast furnaces or use electric arcs to melt scrap; in both cases the molten metal must be kept above 1,500°C and transferred through extensive hot piping and vessels. It is operated by Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC. It emits about 87,417 t CO₂e a year from Climate TRACE, roughly comparable to the annual emissions of 20k passenger cars.

1,000kt steel/yr (Global Energy Monitor)
87,417t CO₂e / yr (Climate TRACE)
#679CO₂ rank in United States

Facility data: Climate TRACE v6 (asset-level capacity & CO₂e, CC BY 4.0), id ct-1567135.

Data status

Known source data

FacilityOutokumpu Stainless USA steel plant Climate TRACE
CountryUnited States Climate TRACE
Coordinates31.15169, -87.9883 Climate TRACE
Sector / subsectoriron-and-steel Climate TRACE
Owner / operatorOutokumpu Stainless USA LLC Climate TRACE
EPA parent companyOUTOKUMPU STAINLESS US EPA GHGRP
EPA NAICS331110 US EPA GHGRP
TRI facility recordOUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA LLC US EPA TRI
TRI parent companyOUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA US EPA TRI
TRI NAICS331110 US EPA TRI
TRI reported chemicalsAmmonia, Chromium and Chromium Compounds(except for chromite ore mined in the Transvaal Region), Copper And Copper Compounds, Hydrogen fluoride, Lead And Lead Compounds, Manganese And Manganese Compounds… US EPA TRI
TRI on-site releases712,375 lb/yr US EPA TRI
GEM steel parentOutokumpu Oyj [100.0%] Global Energy Monitor
Steel process routeelectric Global Energy Monitor
Steel asset statusoperating Global Energy Monitor
Steel equipmentEAF Global Energy Monitor
Steel capacity1,000 ktpa Global Energy Monitor
Modelled CO₂e87,417 t/yr Climate TRACE
Measured CO₂ cross-check158,190 t/yr measured cross-check · GHGRP 2023

Calculated from the dataset

United States rank#679 of 1910 · top 35.5% calculated
Global iron-and-steel rank#685 of 868 · top 78.9% calculated
Climate contextderived from coordinates calculated

Not available

Fuel typeNot available not in dataset
Thermal capacity (MW)Not available not in dataset

Source data, measured cross-checks and calculated values are kept separate. No confidence percentage is invented.

Similar facilities by modelled emissions

Same Climate TRACE subsector; closest non-placeholder modelled CO₂e values. Russia and Belarus excluded.

Operating power plants within 50 km

PowerAtlas operating assets, ordered by great-circle distance from published coordinates.

In context: how this facility compares

Subsector: iron-and-steel. As steel plant, it requires high process heat (typically 800–1500°C) for its core industrial operations — heat that must be supplied by boilers, furnaces or direct combustion, and losses through uninsulated vessels and piping represent wasted fuel. Removable modular insulation can cut those losses by 80–96%, surface-cooling equipment to ≤45°C, with payback often under 2 years. Steel plants burn coal in blast furnaces or use electric arcs to melt scrap; in both cases the molten metal must be kept above 1,500°C and transferred through extensive hot piping and vessels.

Capacity & CO₂-intensity comparison computed from Climate TRACE industrial facilities data; sector role based on engineering reference.

What 87,417 t CO₂e a year looks like

This facility's estimated annual CO₂e (Climate TRACE, modelled) in everyday equivalents from the US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies calculator:

20kcars driven for a year
11khomes' annual energy use
1.5 milliontree seedlings grown 10 years

Equivalencies: US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies. Emissions: Climate TRACE.

Carbon cost, Scope 1 & decarbonization potential

At its reported 87k t CO₂e/yr (Scope 1), Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant carries no domestic carbon price — and as a CBAM-covered product, its 87k t at the EU CBAM rate (€75/t) is €6.6M/yr of exposure on EU-bound exports. CBAM share rises from 2.5% (2026) to 100% by 2034. The fastest decarbonization lever is energy efficiency: eliminating heat loss on hot equipment (removable insulation, steam & waste-heat recovery) typically cuts 2–5% of fuel-related CO₂ — here ≈2k t–4k t/yr, worth €132k€329k, with payback up to 2 years. No domestic carbon price — but cement, steel, aluminium, fertilizer and hydrogen exported to the EU face CBAM at €75/t (rising to 100% by 2034).

Measured CO₂: 158k t/yr — verified GHGRP (reporting year 2023) (81% above the modelled estimate). Modelled estimate 87k t/yr (Climate TRACE), high-confidence match, cross-checked via the measured-vs-modelled dataset (n=711).

87k t CO₂e / yrScope 1 emissions
€6.6M/yrCBAM exposure on EU exports
2k t–4k t/yr ≈ €132k€329kDecarbonization potential

Carbon price: EU CBAM €75/t · EU ETS €79/t, July 2, 2026, refreshed live via Carbon Hub. CO₂: measured (GHGRP RY2023), cross-checked vs Climate TRACE. Efficiency range: US DOE / ASTM C680 (method). Indicative carbon value, not the cash bill — free allocation applies; not compliance advice. Estimate the saving for this site →

Operator

Operated by Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC.

Local climate

Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant sits in a humid subtropical climate zone (Köppen Cfa), at 31.2°N in the northern hemisphere.

~18°Ctypical annual mean
~27°Ctypical warm-season
Humid subtropical: hot summers and mild winters

Köppen zone: Köppen-Geiger world climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006, 0.5° grid).

Site climate & environmental severity

The local climate sets how fast unprotected steel, protective coatings and the insulation on hot process equipment degrade at this site. It sits in a corrosive environment (estimated ISO 9223 class C4 — High), with humidity / wetness the leading environmental stress.

C4ISO 9223 corrosivity (indicative)
42/100environmental-severity index
18.0°Cseasonal temperature swing
62 kmdistance to coast
HighCUI risk tier

In this site’s local climate, a bare 150 °C surface sheds about 1312 W/m² to ambient — roughly 1.01× the loss at a 20 °C reference; removable insulation recovers about 1246 W/m² of that. Reference-surface calculation at a 150 °C surface from WorldClim climate normals (ASTM C680 / ISO 12241) — an indicative per-climate comparison, not a measurement of this site’s specific equipment. Open method dataset: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20787408 (CC BY 4.0).

Higher environmental severity is exactly where protective removable insulation pays back most: a sheltered micro-climate slows corrosion, UV and thermal-cycling damage and extends outdoor hardware service life. This is an indicative site-climate context — not a condition assessment of any specific plant or operator.

Indicative estimate via the ISO 9223:2012 informative method (atmospheric corrosivity from temperature, time-of-wetness and airborne salinity), using WorldClim climate normals, the Köppen-Geiger class and coast distance. Indicative, not a measured corrosion rate.

How it compares & nearby sites

Nearby industrial sites

Location

Coordinates 31.15169, -87.9883. View on OpenStreetMap.

Heat loss & insulation profile

For a steel plant, the main modular-insulation targets are reheat & annealing furnaces, ladles, hot-blast stoves, steam & gas ducting. Typical hot-surface ranges used for screening: 200–1,200 °C.

Indicative recoverable energy

A first-pass insulation screen suggests about 3,600 MWh/year of recoverable heat-loss reduction and about 1,200 t CO₂e/year of avoided emissions. Screening estimate scaled from installed process-heat projects and surface-temperature reduction data.

See Inzonex Modular Insulation → Run the calculator →

Screening calculation from facility class, capacity and open emissions/energy context. Engineering survey required before procurement.

Safety & the no-regret first step

Start with a thermal survey of valves, flanges, doors and bends. Removable modular insulation keeps maintenance access open while lowering exposed-surface temperature and wasted heat.

United States: funding & obligation

Funding. Investment tax credit up to 30% of qualified investment incl. industrial decarbonization; open to small/medium/large manufacturers. official source · verified 2026
Status: ~$6B of $10B allocated Jan-2025; remaining capacity + IRA status under political review — verify before 'apply now'.

Obligation. None at federal level (voluntary). Some states have their own programs. (applies as a rule above the stated threshold — we do not hold this site's metered energy use). · verified 2026

Programme terms verified 2026-06-18; confirm the current open phase before applying. Eligibility depends on a site's energy use / headcount, which we do not hold — not a per-facility eligibility determination.

Frequently asked questions

What type of facility is Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant?

Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant is a steel plant in United States. Steel plants burn coal in blast furnaces or use electric arcs to melt scrap; in both cases the molten metal must be kept above 1,500°C and transferred through extensive hot piping and vessels.

How much CO₂ does Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant emit?

The page uses about 87,417 t CO₂e/year from the open dataset It ranks #679 among facilities in United States by estimated CO₂.

Where is Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant located?

Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant is in United States at approximately 31.15169, -87.9883.

Who operates Outokumpu Stainless USA steel plant?

The operator recorded in the open dataset is Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC.

Built from open public data; no personal information. Operate this site? Request a correction or removal.