Home / Asia / North Korea / Steel plants / Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant

Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant

Steel Plant in North Korea. Approximate location 41.75076, 129.74982.

Steel PlantNorth KoreaCO₂ estimate (modelled)

Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant is a steel plant in North Korea. Its listed capacity is 6,000,000 t of steel. Steel plants burn coal in blast furnaces or use electric arcs to melt scrap; in both cases the molten metal must be kept above 1,500°C and transferred through extensive hot piping and vessels. It is operated by Government of North Korea. By capacity it ranks #1 among 2 steel plants in North Korea. It emits about 8,508,209 t CO₂e a year from Climate TRACE, roughly comparable to the annual emissions of 2.0 million passenger cars. Its CO₂ per unit of capacity is 53% above the national median for this sector.

6,000,000t of steel
8,508,209t CO₂e / yr (Climate TRACE)
#1CO₂ rank in North Korea
1.42t CO₂ per capacity unit

Facility data: Climate TRACE v6 (asset-level capacity & CO₂e, CC BY 4.0), id ct-32440878.

Data status

Known source data

FacilityKim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant Climate TRACE
CountryNorth Korea Climate TRACE
Coordinates41.75076, 129.74982 Climate TRACE
Sector / subsectoriron-and-steel Climate TRACE
Reported capacity6,000,000 t of steel Climate TRACE
Owner / operatorGovernment of North Korea Climate TRACE
GEM steel parentGovernment of North Korea [100%] Global Energy Monitor
Steel process routeintegrated BF Global Energy Monitor
Steel asset statusoperating Global Energy Monitor
Steel equipmentBF, BOF, EAF, OHF Global Energy Monitor
Steel capacity6,000 ktpa Global Energy Monitor
Modelled CO₂e8,508,209 t/yr Climate TRACE

Calculated from the dataset

North Korea rank#1 of 9 · top 11.1% calculated
Global iron-and-steel rank#75 of 868 · top 8.6% calculated
Climate contextderived from coordinates calculated

Not available

Fuel typeNot available not in dataset
Thermal capacity (MW)Not available not in dataset

Source data, measured cross-checks and calculated values are kept separate. No confidence percentage is invented.

Similar facilities by modelled emissions

Same Climate TRACE subsector; closest non-placeholder modelled CO₂e values. Russia and Belarus excluded.

Operating power plants within 50 km

PowerAtlas operating assets, ordered by great-circle distance from published coordinates.

In context: how this facility compares

At 6,000,000 t of steel, Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant is around the median steel plant in North Korea (6,000,000 t of steel). Subsector: iron-and-steel. As steel plant, it requires high process heat (typically 800–1500°C) for its core industrial operations — heat that must be supplied by boilers, furnaces or direct combustion, and losses through uninsulated vessels and piping represent wasted fuel. Removable modular insulation can cut those losses by 80–96%, surface-cooling equipment to ≤45°C, with payback often under 2 years. Steel plants burn coal in blast furnaces or use electric arcs to melt scrap; in both cases the molten metal must be kept above 1,500°C and transferred through extensive hot piping and vessels.

Capacity & CO₂-intensity comparison computed from Climate TRACE industrial facilities data; sector role based on engineering reference.

What 8,508,209 t CO₂e a year looks like

This facility's estimated annual CO₂e (Climate TRACE, modelled) in everyday equivalents from the US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies calculator:

2.0 millioncars driven for a year
1.1 millionhomes' annual energy use
142 milliontree seedlings grown 10 years

Equivalencies: US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies. Emissions: Climate TRACE.

Carbon cost, Scope 1 & decarbonization potential

At its reported 8.5M t CO₂e/yr (Scope 1), Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant carries no domestic carbon price — and as a CBAM-covered product, its 8.5M t at the EU CBAM rate (€75/t) is €641M/yr of exposure on EU-bound exports. CBAM share rises from 2.5% (2026) to 100% by 2034. The fastest decarbonization lever is energy efficiency: eliminating heat loss on hot equipment (removable insulation, steam & waste-heat recovery) typically cuts 2–5% of fuel-related CO₂ — here ≈170k t–425k t/yr, worth €12.8M€32.1M, with payback up to 2 years. No domestic carbon price — but cement, steel, aluminium, fertilizer and hydrogen exported to the EU face CBAM at €75/t (rising to 100% by 2034).

8.5M t CO₂e / yrScope 1 emissions
€641M/yrCBAM exposure on EU exports
170k t–425k t/yr ≈ €12.8M€32.1MDecarbonization potential

Carbon price: EU CBAM €75/t · EU ETS €79/t, July 2, 2026, refreshed live via Carbon Hub. CO₂: Climate TRACE. Efficiency range: US DOE / ASTM C680 (method). Indicative carbon value, not the cash bill — free allocation applies; not compliance advice. Estimate the saving for this site →

Capacity vs largest steel plants in North Korea

Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant: 6,000,000 t of steel6.0MKim Chaek …Ch'ollima Steel Complex steel plant: 752,000 t of steel752kCh'ollima …

Listed capacity (t of steel), Climate TRACE v6 (asset-level capacity & CO₂e, CC BY 4.0).

Operator

Operated by Government of North Korea. All facilities by this operator →

Local climate

Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant sits in a monsoon warm-summer continental climate zone (Köppen Dwb), at 41.8°N in the northern hemisphere.

~6°Ctypical annual mean
~21°Ctypical warm-season
Monsoon warm-summer continental: four distinct seasons — cold winters and warm summers

Köppen zone: Köppen-Geiger world climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006, 0.5° grid).

Site climate & environmental severity

The local climate sets how fast unprotected steel, protective coatings and the insulation on hot process equipment degrade at this site. It sits in a corrosive environment (estimated ISO 9223 class C4 — High), with marine corrosion the leading environmental stress.

C4ISO 9223 corrosivity (indicative)
45/100environmental-severity index
27.3°Cseasonal temperature swing
0 kmdistance to coast
HighCUI risk tier

In this site’s local climate, a bare 150 °C surface sheds about 1424 W/m² to ambient — roughly 1.09× the loss at a 20 °C reference; removable insulation recovers about 1353 W/m² of that. Reference-surface calculation at a 150 °C surface from WorldClim climate normals (ASTM C680 / ISO 12241) — an indicative per-climate comparison, not a measurement of this site’s specific equipment. Open method dataset: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20787408 (CC BY 4.0).

Higher environmental severity is exactly where protective removable insulation pays back most: a sheltered micro-climate slows corrosion, UV and thermal-cycling damage and extends outdoor hardware service life. This is an indicative site-climate context — not a condition assessment of any specific plant or operator.

Indicative estimate via the ISO 9223:2012 informative method (atmospheric corrosivity from temperature, time-of-wetness and airborne salinity), using WorldClim climate normals, the Köppen-Geiger class and coast distance. Indicative, not a measured corrosion rate.

How it compares & nearby sites

The #1 largest of 2 steel plants in North Korea by listed capacity (Climate TRACE).

Nearby industrial sites

Location

Coordinates 41.75076, 129.74982. View on OpenStreetMap.

Heat loss & insulation profile

For a steel plant, the main modular-insulation targets are reheat & annealing furnaces, ladles, hot-blast stoves, steam & gas ducting. Typical hot-surface ranges used for screening: 200–1,200 °C.

Indicative recoverable energy

A first-pass insulation screen suggests about 8,800 MWh/year of recoverable heat-loss reduction and about 3,000 t CO₂e/year of avoided emissions. Screening estimate scaled from installed process-heat projects and surface-temperature reduction data.

See Inzonex Modular Insulation → Run the calculator →

Screening calculation from facility class, capacity and open emissions/energy context. Engineering survey required before procurement.

Safety & the no-regret first step

Start with a thermal survey of valves, flanges, doors and bends. Removable modular insulation keeps maintenance access open while lowering exposed-surface temperature and wasted heat.

External climate finance your country can access

For energy-efficiency projects around process heat, likely external funding channels include:

Sources: country climate-finance facilities and public development-bank programmes.

Frequently asked questions

What type of facility is Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant?

Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant is a steel plant in North Korea. Steel plants burn coal in blast furnaces or use electric arcs to melt scrap; in both cases the molten metal must be kept above 1,500°C and transferred through extensive hot piping and vessels.

What capacity is listed for Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant?

The open dataset lists 6,000,000 t of steel of capacity for Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant.

How much CO₂ does Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant emit?

The page uses about 8,508,209 t CO₂e/year from the open dataset It ranks #1 among facilities in North Korea by estimated CO₂.

Where is Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant located?

Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant is in North Korea at approximately 41.75076, 129.74982.

Who operates Kim Chaek Iron and Steel Complex steel plant?

The operator recorded in the open dataset is Government of North Korea.

Built from open public data; no personal information. Operate this site? Request a correction or removal.