Which industrial facilities have measured CO₂ cross-checks?
660 IndustryAtlas facility pages have high-confidence measured CO₂ cross-checks. The page keeps the measured registry value separate from the Climate TRACE modelled estimate, so users can see where they agree or diverge.
Facilities with measured CO₂ cross-checks
Source: Climate TRACE v6 (CC BY 4.0). Modelled estimates.
Largest measured-vs-modelled differences
| Facility | Country | Measured source | Year | Measured vs modelled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillips 66 BAYWAY REFINERY | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +1625% |
| Phillips 66 Ponca City Refinery | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +1194% |
| St. Paul Park Refining Company, LLC | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +1135% |
| SAN FRANCISCO REFINERY AT RODEO | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +1006% |
| Delaware City Refinery | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +959% |
| SIMPLOT PHOSPHATES | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +798% |
| ARKEMA INC CLEAR LAKE | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +766% |
| VALERO REFINING CO. (PREV. PREMCOR REFINING, PREV. WILLIAMS REFINING LLC) | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +738% |
| VALERO REFINING CO -OKLAHOMA VALERO ARDMORE REFINERY | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +655% |
| NAVAJO REFINING COMPANY, LLC - Artesia Refinery | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +611% |
| VALERO CORPUS CHRISTI REFINERY | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +580% |
| Oro Grande Cement Plant | United States | GHGRP | 2023 | +556% |
Sources: EU ETS/EUTL and US EPA GHGRP matches. Differences are shown only for high-confidence measured cross-checks.
Why this matters
Most global facility CO₂ data is modelled. For 660 facility pages, IndustryAtlas can show a separate measured registry value and the modelled value without merging them into one false precision number.
Explore the full data: browse rankings → · data sources
Frequently asked questions
Is measured CO₂ better than modelled CO₂?
It is a different evidence layer. Measured registry data is source-reported for covered facilities; modelled data gives global coverage where registries are absent.
Why keep measured and modelled values separate?
Merging them would imply false precision. Keeping both visible makes uncertainty and provenance clearer.
Which registries are used?
The current cross-check layer uses EU ETS/EUTL and US EPA GHGRP matches where confidence is high.