Hui-Liang Industrial Co., Ltd.

Hui-Liang Industrial Co., Ltd. is a textile mill in Taiwan with a reported capacity of 129,602,648 USD. It spins, dyes and finishes textiles, leather or apparel using process steam. By capacity it ranks #12 of 151 textile mills tracked in Taiwan. It emits about 10,693 tonnes of CO₂e per year (Climate TRACE) — roughly the tailpipe emissions of 2,493 cars.

Facility data: Climate TRACE v6 (asset-level capacity & CO₂e, CC BY 4.0), id ct-38479573.

W kontekście: jak ta instalacja się porównuje

Przy 129,602,648 USD, Hui-Liang Industrial Co., Ltd. jest około medianę textile mill w Taiwan (129,602,648 USD). Podsektor: textiles-leather-apparel. Jako textile mill, wymaga intensywnego ciepła procesowego (typowo 60–150°C) do swoich głównych operacji przemysłowych — ciepła, które musi być dostarczane przez kotły, piece lub spalanie bezpośrednie, a straty przez nieisolowane zbiorniki i rury stanowią zmarnowane paliwo. Modułowa izolacja demontowalna może zmniejszyć te straty o 80–96%, chłodząc powierzchnie do ≤45°C, z zwrotem inwestycji często poniżej 2 lat. Fabryki tekstylne używają pary procesowej do barwienia, finicowania i suszenia, często wymagając ścisłej kontroli temperatury przez długie okresy pracy — ciągłe straty ciepła zmniejszają zyski.

Porównanie pojemności i intensywności CO₂ obliczane na podstawie danych instalacji przemysłowych Climate TRACE; rola sektora oparta na odniesieniau inżynierskim.

What 10,693 t CO₂e a year looks like

This facility's reported annual CO₂e in the everyday equivalents from the US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies calculator:

Equivalencies: US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies. Emissions: Climate TRACE.

Capacity vs largest textile mills in Taiwan

Reported capacity (USD), Climate TRACE v6 (asset-level capacity & CO₂e, CC BY 4.0).

Local climate

Hui-Liang Industrial Co., Ltd. sits in a humid subtropical (dry winter) climate zone (Köppen Cwa), at 23.1°N in the northern hemisphere.

Köppen zone: Köppen-Geiger world climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006, 0.5° grid).

How it compares & nearby sites

The #12 largest of 151 textile mills in Taiwan by reported capacity.

Nearby industrial sites

• Injextech Inc. · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Tonnie Cosmetics Co. Ltd. · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Prohero Optical Co., Ltd. · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Metro Factory 2 · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Hermin Textile Co., Ltd. · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Torng Yaw Co. Ltd. · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂

Location

Coordinates 23.05853, 120.13583. View on OpenStreetMap.

Heat loss & insulation profile

A textile mill like this runs hot equipment that sheds heat continuously: dyeing vessels, stenters/dryers, steam lines, hot-water & boiler house (surface/process temperatures around 80–200 °C). These surfaces lose energy to the air year-round; removable modular insulation cuts that loss, brings outer surfaces to ≤45 °C, and unclips for inspection.

effectively industrial laundries/dyeing - steam & hot water; 500-3000 MWh typical.

Indicative recoverable energy

On an already-insulated site (pipes & valves in cladding / jackets), closing the remaining gaps, flanges and damaged sections and switching to removable covers indicatively recovers about 3,000 MWh/yr (≈ 600 t CO₂/yr) — scaled to this site's reported CO₂ within its sector. Bare or damaged surfaces recover several times more.

See Inzonex insulation → Estimate your site →

Indicative, not a measurement. Conservative floor for an already-insulated plant; a TIPCHECK on-site audit gives a measured figure. Industry context: EiiF TIPCHECK — industrial insulation can save ~14 Mtoe/yr in EU, payback typically <2 years.

Safety & the no-regret first step

Bare hot surfaces here exceed the touch-safe limit (EN ISO 13732-1); insulation to ≤45 °C is a worker-safety and compliance win. And before electrification, fuel-switching or CCS, eliminating surface heat loss is the cheapest, fastest, lowest-risk step — audit the bare spots first, rip-and-replace later.

External climate finance your country can access

Domestic energy-efficiency grants are limited here; industrial decarbonisation is mainly funded externally:

• Japan JCM (Joint Crediting Mechanism) — Japan co-finances diffusion of decarbonising tech incl. INDUSTRIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY in partner countries, in exchange for carbon credits. Channels: MOEJ model projects, ADB trust funds, NEDO demonstrations.
• UK International Climate Finance (ICF / ODA) — ~GBP 6bn ODA over 3 yrs; industrial-decarbonisation flows via Climate Investment Funds (CIF) - Clean Technology Fund.
• Green Climate Fund (GCF) + ADB / World Bank / UNIDO — Concessional finance & grants for industrial energy efficiency. E.g. GCF $200M ADB-led India Green Finance Facility; World Bank FP071 'Scaling Up Energy Efficiency for Industrial Enterprises in Vietnam'; ASEAN ACGF energy-efficiency revolving funds incl. SMEs.

Routed via national development banks / accredited entities — not a direct factory grant. Verified 2026.

Frequently asked questions