Jia-Zhan Textile Technology Co., Ltd.

Jia-Zhan Textile Technology Co., Ltd. is a textile mill in Taiwan with a reported capacity of 129,602,648 USD. It spins, dyes and finishes textiles, leather or apparel using process steam. By capacity it ranks #130 of 151 textile mills tracked in Taiwan. It emits about 10,693 tonnes of CO₂e per year (Climate TRACE) — roughly the tailpipe emissions of 2,493 cars.

Facility data: Climate TRACE v6 (asset-level capacity & CO₂e, CC BY 4.0), id ct-38479802.

Im Kontext: wie sich diese Anlage vergleicht

Bei 129,602,648 USD ist Jia-Zhan Textile Technology Co., Ltd. etwa um dem Medianwert von textile mill in Taiwan (129,602,648 USD). Untersektor: textiles-leather-apparel. Als textile mill benötigt es intensive Prozesswärme (typischerweise 60–150°C) für seinen Kernbetrieb — Wärme, die durch Dampfkessel, Öfen oder direkte Verbrennung geliefert werden muss, und Verluste durch ungedämmte Behälter und Rohrleitungen stellen verschwendeten Brennstoff dar. Modulare abnehmbare Dämmung kann diese Verluste um 80–96% senken, Oberflächen auf ≤45°C kühlen, mit Amortisationszeiten oft unter 2 Jahren. Textilfabriken nutzen Prozessdampf zum Färben, Veredeln und Trocknen, erfordern oft enge Temperaturkontrolle über lange Laufzeiten — kontinuierliche Wärmeverluste schmälern Gewinne.

Vergleich von Kapazität und CO₂-Intensität berechnet aus Climate TRACE Industrieanlagendaten; Sektorrolle basierend auf Ingenieurreferenz.

What 10,693 t CO₂e a year looks like

This facility's reported annual CO₂e in the everyday equivalents from the US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies calculator:

Equivalencies: US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies. Emissions: Climate TRACE.

Capacity vs largest textile mills in Taiwan

Reported capacity (USD), Climate TRACE v6 (asset-level capacity & CO₂e, CC BY 4.0).

Local climate

Jia-Zhan Textile Technology Co., Ltd. sits in a humid subtropical climate zone (Köppen Cfa), at 24.3°N in the northern hemisphere.

Köppen zone: Köppen-Geiger world climate classification (Kottek et al. 2006, 0.5° grid).

How it compares & nearby sites

The #130 largest of 151 textile mills in Taiwan by reported capacity.

Nearby industrial sites

• Ming Feng Plastic Co Ltd · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Chang Wong Industrial Co., Ltd. · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Bentex Essentials Sustainable Textiles Co. Ltd. · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Chuan Cheng Hat Co. Ltd. - Ta-Ya Factory · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂
• Feng Hsin Steel Taichung plant · Steel Plant · 116,394 t CO₂
• Tsan Chen Textile Trading Co., Ltd · Textiles · 10,693 t CO₂

Location

Coordinates 24.25358, 120.68114. View on OpenStreetMap.

Heat loss & insulation profile

A textile mill like this runs hot equipment that sheds heat continuously: dyeing vessels, stenters/dryers, steam lines, hot-water & boiler house (surface/process temperatures around 80–200 °C). These surfaces lose energy to the air year-round; removable modular insulation cuts that loss, brings outer surfaces to ≤45 °C, and unclips for inspection.

effectively industrial laundries/dyeing - steam & hot water; 500-3000 MWh typical.

Indicative recoverable energy

On an already-insulated site (pipes & valves in cladding / jackets), closing the remaining gaps, flanges and damaged sections and switching to removable covers indicatively recovers about 3,000 MWh/yr (≈ 600 t CO₂/yr) — scaled to this site's reported CO₂ within its sector. Bare or damaged surfaces recover several times more.

See Inzonex insulation → Estimate your site →

Indicative, not a measurement. Conservative floor for an already-insulated plant; a TIPCHECK on-site audit gives a measured figure. Industry context: EiiF TIPCHECK — industrial insulation can save ~14 Mtoe/yr in EU, payback typically <2 years.

Safety & the no-regret first step

Bare hot surfaces here exceed the touch-safe limit (EN ISO 13732-1); insulation to ≤45 °C is a worker-safety and compliance win. And before electrification, fuel-switching or CCS, eliminating surface heat loss is the cheapest, fastest, lowest-risk step — audit the bare spots first, rip-and-replace later.

External climate finance your country can access

Domestic energy-efficiency grants are limited here; industrial decarbonisation is mainly funded externally:

• Japan JCM (Joint Crediting Mechanism) — Japan co-finances diffusion of decarbonising tech incl. INDUSTRIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY in partner countries, in exchange for carbon credits. Channels: MOEJ model projects, ADB trust funds, NEDO demonstrations.
• UK International Climate Finance (ICF / ODA) — ~GBP 6bn ODA over 3 yrs; industrial-decarbonisation flows via Climate Investment Funds (CIF) - Clean Technology Fund.
• Green Climate Fund (GCF) + ADB / World Bank / UNIDO — Concessional finance & grants for industrial energy efficiency. E.g. GCF $200M ADB-led India Green Finance Facility; World Bank FP071 'Scaling Up Energy Efficiency for Industrial Enterprises in Vietnam'; ASEAN ACGF energy-efficiency revolving funds incl. SMEs.

Routed via national development banks / accredited entities — not a direct factory grant. Verified 2026.

Frequently asked questions